有個(gè)網(wǎng)民如是說,其經(jīng)驗(yàn)比較完整,供大家參考:
n8u*JeN ]J Ml| e http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 1bSD,;$sQ
10O$'` Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
d~Mg
vh' ^npJUa I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
+pp9d -n P^i .La, The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
Uu'dv#4 Iw available, but more difficult to use.
